These are some areas that many students find challenging:
Jeremy Stone Weber, Defining Cyberlibel: A First Amendment Limit for Libel Suits against Individuals Arising from Computer Bulletin Board Speech, 46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 235, 258 (1995), https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol46/iss1/7.
Jeremy Stone Weber, Defining Cyberlibel: A First Amendment Limit for Libel Suits against Individuals Arising from Computer Bulletin Board Speech, 46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 235, 258 (1995), https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol46/iss1/7 ("Defamation that occurs over computer bulletin board systems is best categorized as libel rather than its sibling tort, slander").
"Defamation that occurs over computer bulletin board systems is best categorized as libel rather than its sibling tort, slander." Jeremy Stone Weber, Defining Cyberlibel: A First Amendment Limit for Libel Suits against Individuals Arising from Computer Bulletin Board Speech, 46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 235, 258 (1995), https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol46/iss1/7.
Footnote 1: Jeremy Stone Weber, Defining Cyberlibel: A First Amendment Limit for Libel Suits against Individuals Arising from Computer Bulletin Board Speech, 46 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 235, 258 (1995), https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol46/iss1/7 ("Defamation that occurs over computer bulletin board systems
is best categorized as libel rather than its sibling tort, slander"); Joseph Custer, Cancel Culture and Censorship Effects, 102 Univ. Det. Mercy L. Rev, 51, 52 (2024) ("Exceptions to free speech protections are images, ideas, or information regarding ...defamatory speech") (internal quotes omitted).
Footnote 2: Weber, supra note 1.
Footnote 3: Id.
Because the Custer article is with the Weber article in footnote 1, it is necessary to use supra to cite the Weber article, but because the Weber article is alone in footnote 2, it is OK to use id for footnote 3.