Skip to Main Content

Death Penalty Research

This is a research guide for Prof. Benza's Death Penalty Research Lab I & 2

2023 Topics

[PDF] Criminal Law-Deliberate Use of Two-Step Interrogation Methods Are Permissible When Appropriate Curative Measures Are Employed-United States v. Khweis …

R Coppola - Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev., 2022 - HeinOnline

… "Miranda warnings" prior to custodial interrogation. In recent years, courts have grappled with
the legality of the "two-step interrogation,… Miranda warnings and repeat the interrogation. In …

Save Cite Related articles

[PDF] heinonline.org

[PDF] The Right to Remain Silent... Sometimes: Why Sec. 1983 Claims for Miranda Violations Are Necessary to Fifth Amendment Protection

L Moore - Mo. L. Rev., 2023 - HeinOnline

… interrogations dates back to well before Miranda v. Arizona.1 … to Miranda, the Court carved
out certain interrogation rules to … They may either follow a two-step approach that involves first …

Save Cite Related articles All 2 versions

[PDF] heinonline.org

[PDF] Silence Isn't Suspicious: Why the Post-Arrest Pre-Miranda Circuit Split Is Unfairly Prejudical to Suspects with Autism Spectrum Disorder

S Milicia - Drexel L. Rev., 2023 - HeinOnline

State of Delay: Are Outdated Capital Post-Conviction Defense Tactics Undermining Effectiveness and the Attorney-Client Relationship?

Authors:
May, Lyle C.1
Source:
Journal of Law & Policy. 2023, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p49-89. 41p.
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*LAWYERS
*MENTAL illness
*UNITED States appellate courts
*FEDERAL courts
NAICS/Industry Codes:
541110 Offices of Lawyers
911210 Federal courts of law
People:
ALLEN, Scott
Abstract:
In 2018, death row prisoner Scott Allen was ordered to undergo a psychiatric evaluation to determine whether he was competent enough to fire his appointed attorneys. The competency hearing was not ordered by Scott’s counsel; rather, a superior court judge did so at the behest of an undisclosed third party. The problem was that Scott Allen had no history or symptoms of an intellectual disability or mental illness, nor was either a mitigatory claim in his appeal. The attorney-client conflict was triggered by Scott’s pro se effort to remove counsel after they ignored his lawful instructions to include potentially exculpatory evidence in an appellate brief. Exclusion of such information in the brief at the state level would find it procedurally barred in a federal habeas petition. This danger was reinforced by the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority ruling in Shinn v. Ramirez. The Court held that defendants bear responsibility for all attorney errors and cannot depend on federal courts to be fact finders when new evidence that should have been presented in state courts is raised in a habeas petition. This procedural bar prevents raising a claim of ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel, creating a circumstance where defendants must be a check against less than diligent attorneys. When capital defendants pursue due process in the course of their appeals, they often contend with attorneys who are only interested in their own agendas and defense strategies, interference from third parties that support defense counsel but not necessarily the interests of the defendant, federal courts hamstrung by Supreme Court rulings, and the “otherism” taught to attorneys in the 2003 American Bar Association ethical guidelines. Through this quagmire, capital defendants gamble life and freedom on the ability of their attorneys to avoid errors and pursue client interests. It is through this legal nightmare those who seek to overturn wrongful convictions must fight the status quo of delay. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
 
Copyright of Journal of Law & Policy is the property of Brooklyn Law School and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
  • Deconstructing the Paradox of the Constitutional Incarceration of Innocent Citizens.

    Academic Journal

    By: Charles, Rebecca. Missouri Law Review. 2020, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p247-270. 24p. , Database: Academic Search Premier

    Subjects: HABEAS corpus; ACTUAL innocence; CAPITAL punishment; CRIMINAL law; CLEMENCY

    PDF Full Text

  • 2.

    RETHINKING THE TIMING OF CAPITAL CLEMENCY.

    Academic Journal

    By: Gershowitz, Adam M. Michigan Law Review. Oct2014, Vol. 113 Issue 1, p1-55. 55p. , Database: Academic Search Premier

    Subjects: CLEMENCY; CAPITAL punishment sentencing; APPELLATE procedure; HABEAS corpus; GOVERNORS -- Powers & duties; LEGAL status of death row inmates; PAROLE boards; ACTIONS & defenses (Law); STATE laws; UNITED States; Executive Offices; Parole Offices and Probation Offices; Federal correctional services

    PDF Full Text(1.8MB)

  • 3.

    A CASE FOR ACTUAL INNOCENCE.

    Academic Journal

    By: Aglialoro, Matthew. Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy. Spring2014, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p635-660. 26p. , Database: Legal Collection

    Subjects: UNITED States; ACTUAL innocence; HERRERA v. Collins (Supreme Court case); UNITED States. Supreme Court; LEGAL status of prisoners; HABEAS corpus; UNITED States. Constitution. 8th Amendment; EXECUTIONS & executioners; DUE process of law; LAW

    Full Text FinderFull Text Finder

Finality in Criminal Law and Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners [article]

 
Harvard Law Review, Vol. 76, Issue 3 (January 1963), pp. 441-528
Bator, Paul M. (Cited 1821 times)
 
76 Harv. L. Rev. 441 (1962-1963)
 
 
 
 
 

More Information PathFinder Subjects: Criminal Law and ProcedureHabeas CorpusJurisprudencePrisonersPenologyJurisdiction

 

 

 

PDF

Cited by 824 Articles
Cited by 166 Cases
Accessed 68 Times

[PDF] Habeas Myths, Past and Present

L Kovarsky - Tex. L. Rev. Online, 2022 - HeinOnline

… Halliday laid waste to the whig take on English habeas practice, relying on his multicentury
… creatively used habeas process to aggrandize judicial power.13 Professor Halliday was …

Save Cite Related articles

[PDF] capdefnet.org

The New Negative Habeas Equity

L Kovarsky - Available at SSRN 4520056, 2023 - papers.ssrn.com

… Along with many others, I consider Professor Halliday’s book to be the defining work of
English habeas history, and I reference it often throughout this Essay. See, eg, Stephen I. Vladeck…

Save Cite All 2 versions 

[PDF] cambridge.orgCheck for Access @ CWRU

English Laws, Global Histories; or, What Makes a Court Supreme?

PD Halliday - Journal of British Studies, 2023 - cambridge.org

… As did other supreme courts, the justices in Colombo analogized their authority to use
habeas corpus by common law. As Justice Charles Marshall put it, “the right of issuing writs …

Save Cite Related articles

[PDF] researchgate.net

Sovereign Images and Contested Jurisdictions: Legal Personhood in British Columbia Colonial Law and through the Writ of Habeas Corpus

MP Unger - Interrupting the Legal Person, 2022 - emerald.com

… And, more problematically, in the case of the writ’s corollary suspension clause, as Halliday
and White point out, habeas corpus masks a politics of recognition. The initial writ of 1679 …

Save Cite Related articles All 4 versions 

[PDF] heinonline.org

[PDF] Post-AEDPA Compromise: Increased Habeas Corpus Relief for Capital Cases and Tighter Restrictions for Noncapital Cases

N Beekhuizen - Ind. JL & Soc. Equal., 2022 - HeinOnline

… a rapid rise in habeas petitions that threatened conservation … before they could receive
federal habeas relief. Post-AEDPA … decisions that expanded federal habeas corpus, subsequent …

Save Cite Related articles All 3 versions

Habeas Corpus

D Frände, E Yli-Hemminki - Elgar Encyclopedia of Crime and …, 2022 - elgaronline.com

… of habeas corpus. It will provide a summary of how the writ has developed in → England and
Wales and the → USA. Next, we deal with habeas … of habeas corpus. The first is the right to …

Save Cite Related articles All 2 versions 

[PDF] unimi.it

Sovranità e colonia. Un caso indiano di Habeas Corpus (1828-1829): Articolo sottoposto a procedimento di peer-review

G Abbate - Italian Review of Legal History, 2022 - riviste.unimi.it

… towards the application of habeas corpus in favor of the colonized subjects. Being a tool that
… 63 Sul tema dell’operatività del writ di habeas corpus in colonia, Halliday, 2010; Halliday

Save Cite Related articles All 2 versions 

Collateral Effects of Habeas Retrogression

D Ranjan - 2023 - papers.ssrn.com

… in incarceration are not grounds for habeas relief, or even habeas inquiry. In this Note, I take
… his newly proposed regime for habeas corpus. I conclude that if habeas corpus were held to …

Save Cite Related articles 

[PDF] heinonline.org

[PDF] The Promise of Habeas Corpus Post-Vavilov: The Principle of Legality

M Mancini - Can. B. Rev., 2022 - HeinOnline

… habeas corpus after the Supreme Court's decision in Vavilov from the perspective of the
principle of legality. It suggests that while Vavilov should change how habeas … of habeas corpus, …

Save Cite Related articles All 4 versions

APPLIED LEGAL HISTORY AND THE PRINCIPLED WAY FORWARD TO THE RECOGNITION OF IMPLIED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

R Alford - 2022 - papers.ssrn.com

… Brophy praised the work of Paul Halliday on habeas corpus (of which more will be said later
in this paper), holding it up as an example of work that can “help us understand the context …

Save Cite Related articles 

 

Making habeas work : a legal history / Eric M. Freedman

Freedman, Eric M., author

1805

Rating:

 

LOCATION CALL NO. STATUS
 Law Library Stacks

 KF9011.F745 2018    AVAILABLE

2

Add to Bag

E-BOOK

2018

 

Making habeas work : a legal history / Eric M. Freedman

Freedman, Eric M., author

New York : New York University Press, [2018]

Rating:

Website
  More...

3

Add to Bag

E-BOOK

2018

 

Making habeas work : a legal history / Eric M. Freedman

Freedman, Eric M., author.

New York : New York University Press, [2018]

Rating:

Website

4

Add to Bag

E-BOOK

2018

 

Making habeas work : a legal history / Eric M. Freedman

Freedman, Eric M., author.

New York : New York University Press, [2018]

Rating:

Website
  More...

 

 

On Lenity: What Justice Gorsuch Didn't Say [comments]

Essay
Virginia Law Review, Vol. 108, Issue 5 (September 2022), pp. 1289-[iv]
Hasbrouck, Brandon (Cited 111 times)
 
108 Va. L. Rev. 1289 (2022)
 
 
 
 
 

More Information PathFinder Subjects: Criminal Law and ProcedureLegislationSupreme Court of the United StatesSentencing and PunishmentPenology

Turn to page
Litman, The Myth of the Great Writ, 100 Tex. L. Rev. 219, 222 (2021) ("While habeas is sometimes a device for securing individual liberty, it has also served as a vehicle for the racialization and subordination of disadvantaged groups and for normalizing excesses of government power, and that is not merely because habeas courts failed to grant relief in some cases."). 06 See, e.g., Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow 59 (2010)

 All Matching Text Pages (1)

 

 

 

PDF

Accessed 31 Times

On Lenity: What Justice Gorsuch Didn't Say [comments]

Essay
Virginia Law Review Online, Vol. 108, pp. 239-264
Hasbrouck, Brandon (Cited 111 times)
 
108 Va. L. Rev. Online 239 (2022)
 
 
 
 
 

More Information PathFinder Subjects: LegislationSupreme Court of the United StatesCriminal Law and ProcedureSentencing and PunishmentPenology

Turn to page
Litman, The Myth of the Great Writ, 100 Tex. L. Rev. 219, 222 (2021) ("While habeas is sometimes a device for securing individual liberty, it has also served as a vehicle for the racialization and subordination of disadvantaged groups and for normalizing excesses of government power, and that is not merely because habeas courts failed to grant relief in some cases."). 106 See, e.g., Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow 59 (2010)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/rule_of_lenity

rule of lenity

 

The rule of lenity is a principle used in criminal law, also called rule of strict construction, stating that when a law is unclear or ambiguous, the court should apply it in the way that is most favorable to the defendant, or to construe the statute against the state. The rule of lenity stems from two constitutional objectives: first, the separation of powers, as it limits the scope of statutory language in penal statutes and does not allow the courts to establish the contours of a crime and its punishment. Second, the rule of lenity stems from the wish to “protect the legislature’s constitutional lawmaking prerogative, and to limit the courts’ encroachment on a legislative function”.

The Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: Reflections on the Law and the Logistics of Direct Review [comments]

The John Randolph Tucker Lecture
Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 34, Issue 4 (Fall 1977), pp. 1043-1066
Wechsler, Herbert (Cited 6393 times)
 
34 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1043 (1977)
 
 
 
 
 

More Information PathFinder Subjects: JurisdictionCreditorsCredit

 

 

 

PDF

Cited by 75 Articles
Cited by 2 Cases
Accessed 18 Times

No More Results